45. CAN WE DOUBT TANGIBLE EXPERIENCES?
The problem with this critique is that if we doubt tangible experiences that seem certain to us, and treat them as hallucinations, what can we say is true? Maybe the reality we are experiencing at the moment is also a dream or a hallucination?
44. THE ARGUMENT OF HALLUCINATION
They claim that while the people who have experienced divine revelations believe in their truth, it is possible that these are all hallucinations caused by various reasons.
43. DOES THE TESTIMONY OF MANY AND THE BELIEF OF THE MAJORITY MAKE IT A FACT?
For a moment, let’s not think of GOD as a religious GOD but an entity that is superior to us. It can even be a particle. Crowds of people throughout history have described experiences of divine revelation they have had, religious or mystical experiences, visions, prophecy, and the like.
42. THE EVIDENCE OF REVELATION
This argument for the existence of GOD is very simple: we know that GOD exists, because many people have testified that they have met him.
PROOF OF A GOD
This vision is good only for those people who do feel that there is absolute good and evil and are not willing to see this feeling as a “mistake.” But there are many such people, and this observation can definitely prove the existence of a GOD for them.
CHAPTER’S CONCLUSION
I have demonstrated here, using seven different scientific methods of evidence, the existence of GOD. I have proven the existence of a very intelligent designer of life and of probably this universe.
41. I CONCLUDE HERE THAT THE SUPREME POWER IS GOD
This power could be a particle or the well-known GOD. The same power is also the one that has instilled in us the moral sense that allows us to recognize those moral facts and feel our commitment to them.
40. OUR MORAL INTUITIONS
The only way our moral intuitions can be justified is by acknowledging that in reality there are absolute moral facts, which are not part of the material nature but are beyond it, and whose inner intuitions are a reflection of them.
39. IS MORALITY MADE OF MERELY MOLECULES?
Unsurprisingly, many proponents of error theory are atheists, for in a world that has nothing but inanimate matter and blind laws of nature, there is no reality that can be a source of objective morality.
38. WE PERCEIVE MORALITY AS OBJECTIVE AND NOT SUBJECTIVE
A careful examination of those moral intuitions leads to the conclusion that we perceive morality not as a subjective emotion but as an objective, absolute, and binding reality.